Wednesday, 1 May 2013

The Spectacle of Technology

When looking at 21st Century education and integrating technology into the classroom, something that I think educators should be aware of is how we are implementing technology and the reasoning behind it.  One of the main arguments that I have come across would be by Neil Postman in his 1990 speech regarding the use of technology in schools. 

He argues that when individuals encounter and use technology they enter a “Faustian bargain where technology giveth and technology taketh away, and not always in equal measure” (pg. 2).  In this argument, he is stating that when new technology is introduced it tends to favour some groups of individuals, while harming others.  He states that this bargain creates both winners and losers depending on which group benefits from the use of technology.  In the context of the education system it is most often that the students are the losers and the teachers or administration are the winners.  Teachers tend to be the winners as they attempt to teach students how to operate the technology rather than teaching them valuable skills or allowing them to create using the technology.  The teachers will encourage students to be enthusiastic about technology as they give examples of the many different tasks that can be performed more easily.  This idea can also show a parallel in the relationship between administration and teachers.  The administration may be adamant about the use of technology in the classroom and attempt to persuade teachers into using it.  Postman argues that when the losers become skeptical of the uses of technology or become bored with it, the winners will attempt to dazzle them by showing the losers marvellous feats that technology can perform.  These feats may have no relevance to the losers’ every day lives however they are still dazzled by them. 

In my practice placements I have witnessed this bargain going on in the classrooms and in some cases I have even participated in it.  In one of my placements I was teaching a grade 10 and grade 11 math class.  For the majority of the class I would use the chalkboard to present the lesson and on occasion I would use a projector and laptop to show the lessons.  This would often include simple slides to a virtual die that would roll and the result would be used to answer probability questions.  This was not often used as the technology would use its appeal.  Here this bargain would have the teachers winning as they have students' engagement for the lesson and the students would be losers as they are not learning anything relatively new or beneficial to them from the technology.

While I do not agree with this form of integrating technology, one of the main issues that I  dealt with was time constraints.  In the teaching placement I had to go into the classroom, develop lesson plans for 3 classes with limited preparation time as well as integrate myself into a new school environment.  While this is just for a practice teaching placement I can only imagine the amount of time a full time teacher would require to successfully implement technology into the classroom.

Along with the issue of time, I was also faced with limited supplies and administrative issues.  In the school there was only a single projector for an entire department however it was hid in the classroom I was in.  The limited supplies limited other teachers to what technology they could implement in the classroom.  There was a changing environment in the school as they were beginning to install smart boards into the classrooms, however there was not an observable urgency in having them implemented.  Throughout my entire 4 week placement the smart board remained in boxes in the staff room and they were not installed.  I checked back in with my associate teacher and found that the smart board had still not been installed after March Break.  While I do not know for sure if this was purely an administrative issue, I would like to think that if one was driven to integrate technology into the classroom 4 weeks would be unacceptable.

Despite these issues, it still falls on the teacher to successfully implement technology into the classroom in hopes that students acquire 21st Century skills, however we must be sure to implement it properly to provide students with learning opportunities rather than as a tool to increase engagement.

4 comments:

  1. Jordan you have made some very interesting points in this week’s blog.
    Schools have a limited amount of funds that they can allocate to the purchase of resources. Usually a school will prioritize their needs based on their school’s improvement plan and achievement data to assist them in this task. When I read about your practicum experience with the coveted projector being hidden in the one class it sparked my curiosity as to what the school had prioritized as its needs for that given year.
    Whether it’s a new policy or technological equipment the school administrators are crucial key in the success of implementation process.
    Smart boards are very expensive pieces of technology and careful thought as to whom and where they will be placed must be given before their arrival. I know this from experience since our school currently has 7 smartboard this has been largely possible through the successful fundraising of our Home and School Association. Before we decide where Smartboard is placed the principal and I consider several factors, such as, 1) has the teacher expressed an interest in having interactive whiteboards 2) Would this individual partner, collaborate, mentor and role model for other teachers that may or may not have the equipment in their classroom 3) would this person be willing to attend ongoing professional development in the area of technology 4) Is technology part of their annual learning plan, etc. After much consideration a decision is made.
    The Smartboards have been strategically placed through the school. We have one board in our library that is used by the librarian in collaboration with the teachers during partners in action. The interactive white boards are in and being used by Veteran and Beginning teachers alike. Through our daily walkthrough of the school and classrooms, we can confidently say that the students and teachers use the equipment on a daily basis in innovative ways. We have 7 out 22 homerooms with Smartboards and 6 more teachers have experienced their desire for the equipment in the event that our school acquires more.
    As for our students, by the time that our students get to the junior grades they are very proficient with technology and programs (such as read and write gold. Our junior students all have kids’ blogs that they keep current and often contribute to each other’s blog. The students also use Google docs to simple group work. These students are ready for middle school.
    As for time constraints and creating lessons, we have to remember that we do not have to reinvent the wheel. You are not alone. As teachers we collaborate and share with each other so that we can plan and create interesting lessons. Not to mention that they are a vast number of websites that teachers can use to plan their lessons some cater directly to interactive technology. Learning to management one’s time and prioritizing is the key and develops with experience.
    Lastly we need to remember the importance of students’ engagement on their achievement and the learning environment. Students that are engaged are motivate dot learn. Students are motivated to learn inspire the teacher. An inspired teacher leads to innovative practices and assessments. This makes it a win-win for all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jordan, I agree that teachers must battle the issue of time when it comes to integrating technology in the classroom. In my experience, finding the time to locate technology within the school can also be a challenge. I was in a school for one of my practicum placements that had a class set of netbooks on a cart teachers had to sign out when they wanted to use it. The problem with this was that tracking down the cart was often very time consuming and problematic. In addition, when it came time for the students to actually use the netbooks, inevitably at least one or two students wouldn’t be able to log on for whatever reason, and some of the netbooks wouldn’t be charged and useable.

      In my blog this week, I also talked about some of the barriers to integrating technology; one of which included teacher training. I think training and preparation goes hand in hand with time. The more experience you have using technology the faster and easier you are able to implement it during a lesson. The only way to get experience is through practice, practice, practice. I think Susanne made an excellent point in that teachers don’t need to reinvent the wheel. Instead, we can model what collaboration looks like by working alongside our colleagues and students. Yes it will be time consuming and we may not end up using technology for what we originally intended, but sometimes the journey is a more powerful learning experience than the end itself. Therefore, I think as teachers we should cut ourselves some slack, allow ourselves to make mistakes, and take as many risks when it comes to technology as possible.

      Delete
  2. HI Jordan

    I immediately thought of "with great power comes great responsibility" - which I think applies to what Postman (1990) is talking about in his speech. Though what he was suggesting is over 20 years old, it is obvious that technology use in some classrooms maintain the winner/loser mentality he is suggesting.
    Yet, as everyone seems to have pointed out this week - all students have technology at their finger tips in the classroom. They have smartphones, lap tops, etc. Perhaps it takes a little bit of innovation on behalf of the teacher to find a way to incorporate what the students already know with their lesson plans. I feel like you were at a disadvantage in your practicum because it didn't sound like you had a lot of support. I think what this class, and what Susan is trying to install in us, is this idea of Professional Learning Networks. If you would have had other teachers available to you at your placement to help with your planning, as well as a few innovators on staff who had used technology in effective and engaging ways in the classroom, maybe your planning would have gone better.

    I feel like both yours and Allison's blog deal more with teacher culture surrounding new ways of approaching education this week, and how many teachers experience difficulties in trying to be innovative/they just don't have to tools to help them do it. I think that is one of those Big Picture problems that needs to be examined on numerous levels.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great points Jordan and interesting responses from your colleagues that push the conversation. As Kat pointed out Postman's words are over 20 years old. i remember his words then and also the times. I don't think that Postman could have imagined today. And although there are dark sides there are also so many potential positives that technology can add to education. Too bad it takes such a learning curve for the teacher. But as Suzanne notes we need to help each other. For example, I am impressed that the general blog page for your group has a running twitter feed for 5P42. How did you do that? I had one for a previous course on my blog but do not have it now. Maybe your group can help me with that? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete